I miss the view from our old apartment so much

Posted 18 minutes ago
with 2 notes
I TOOK THIS PHOTO AND IT HAS 50K NOTES WHAT HAPPENED????

I TOOK THIS PHOTO AND IT HAS 50K NOTES WHAT HAPPENED????

Posted 19 minutes ago
with 53,496 notes

Home
By Melanie Brescia

Posted 11 hours ago
with 205 notes

By Pauly Pholwises

Posted 11 hours ago
with 95 notes

By Juliette Cassidy

Posted 11 hours ago
with 30 notes

By Büşra Şavlı

Posted 11 hours ago
with 86 notes

i hAVE TRIED UPLOADING THESE FOR LIKE TEN HOURS WHAT THE HECK IF THIS POSTS A BILLION TIMES SORRY

Posted 11 hours ago
with 35 notes

Sending a photograph of your breasts to one person isn’t consenting to having the whole world see those breasts, just as consenting to sex with one person isn’t the same as giving permission for everyone else to fu*k you. Victim blaming isn’t okay, even if it does give you a private thrill to humiliate the female victims of sexual exploitation.

This is why you shouldn’t click on the naked photos of Jennifer Lawrence (via brutereason)

Posted 13 hours ago
with 703 notes

News broke yesterday that nude photos of Jennifer Lawrence had been “leaked” online. The truth is they were stolen. They were hacked from her personal technology. They were posted online without her consent. This is a crime. And possibly worst of all, this is something women are supposed to expect… We live in a society where women’s bodies are a commodity to be sold, whether they agree to it or not. And some of the same people who complain about the NSA or Facebook invading their personal privacy will be the same people searching and spreading around these photos.

Large-Scale Hack Lands Stolen Nude Photos Of Jennifer Lawrence & Other Celebrities Online | The Mary Sue (via orderoftaraka)

Posted 13 hours ago
with 2,728 notes

On that note i would just like to say that there is absolutely nothing wrong with taking nudes however it’s 100% disrespectful and wrong to violate someone’s trust or, you know, hacking their shit and basically stealing pictures and sharing them without their consent and if you do that you’re scum

Posted 13 hours ago
with 47 notes
Im on mobile and this message is too long and sent via fanmail(why?) and im lazy but basically yes that’s exactly what it equates to because while yes icloud and photobucket or even just the internet in general make it easier to violate women’s or really anyone’s privacy without facing the consequences, the point is not that victims “make it easy” the point is that someone fucking thought it’s an okay thing to do like how much of an entitled asshole do you have to be? Leaked nudes don’t always get leaked through hacked iclouds or whatever, there are literally guys that get sent private pictures because a woman trusted them and they’re just like haha lol what a slut and share them. This is never about the pictures themselves and always about violating a woman’s privacy and using her as your personal porn just because you can and want to. I want to live in a world where crimes like this are as unthinkable to all men as idk, cannibalism or liking cops

Im on mobile and this message is too long and sent via fanmail(why?) and im lazy but basically yes that’s exactly what it equates to because while yes icloud and photobucket or even just the internet in general make it easier to violate women’s or really anyone’s privacy without facing the consequences, the point is not that victims “make it easy” the point is that someone fucking thought it’s an okay thing to do like how much of an entitled asshole do you have to be? Leaked nudes don’t always get leaked through hacked iclouds or whatever, there are literally guys that get sent private pictures because a woman trusted them and they’re just like haha lol what a slut and share them. This is never about the pictures themselves and always about violating a woman’s privacy and using her as your personal porn just because you can and want to. I want to live in a world where crimes like this are as unthinkable to all men as idk, cannibalism or liking cops

Posted 13 hours ago
with 10 notes
Q Yeah I've been following you for years. But this feminism thing is getting too out of hand. It's not a bad thing, but when you look at it you're making it a bad thing. Have a good life i regret having to unfollow. (Anonymous)
A

?????? *fart noises*

Posted 13 hours ago
with 46 notes

takeatos:

Social Anxiety test. Scores in the 41 - 50 range indicate Severe Social Anxiety.

Posted 13 hours ago
with 83,131 notes

official-mens-frights-activist:

This is why you shouldn’t click on the naked photos of Jennifer Lawrence

fabulouslyfreespirited:

If you deliberately seek out any of these images, you are directly participating in the violation not just of numerous women’s privacy but also of their bodies.
In what’s being called the biggest celebrity hacking incident in internet history, more than 100 female celebrities have had their private nude images stolen and published online. The bulk of the images posted have been officially confirmed as belonging to Jennifer Lawrence, but a complete list of victims’ names - including Krysten Ritter, Kate Upton, Mary Elizabeth Winstead, Rihanna, Brie Larson and Kirsten Dunst - has been subsequently published. (Link does not contain pictures, only names.)
The images were first uploaded by an anonymous member of the underground internet sewer known as 4chan and have since been enthusiastically shared across platforms like Reddit and Twitter. A representative for Lawrence has confirmed the images are real, condemning the theft of them as a “flagrant violation of privacy” and adding that “The authorities have been contacted and will prosecute anyone who posts the stolen photos.”
There are a few different issues that a criminal act like this brings up, but before I get into them it’s necessary to make one thing clear: If you deliberately seek out any of these images, you are directly participating in the violation not just of numerous women’s privacy but also of their bodies. These images - which I have not seen and which I will not look for - are intimate, private moments belonging only to the people who appear in them and who they have invited to see them. To have those moments stolen and broadcast to the world is an egregious act of psychic violence which constitutes a form of assault.
The people sharing these images are perpetuating an ongoing assault. The people gleefully looking at them are witnessing and enjoying an ongoing assault. When you have been asked by victims of a crime like this not to exacerbate the pain of that crime and you continue to do so anyway, you are consciously deciding that your enjoyment, your rights and perhaps even just your curiosity are more important than the safety and dignity of the people you’re exploiting.
That out of the way, let’s get a few other things straight.
1. This is not a ‘scandal’
It’s a crime, and we should be discussing it as such. Some media outlets are salaciously reporting it otherwise, as if the illegal violation of privacy involving intimate images is little more than subject for gossip. When associated with sex, the word ‘scandal’ has been typically interpreted as something that assigns responsibility to all parties involved, a consensual act unfortunately discovered and for which everyone owes an explanation or apology. Remember when private nude photos of Vanessa Hudgens (whose name also appears on the list of victims) were leaked online and Disney forced her to publicly apologise for her “lapse in judgment” and hoped she had “learned a valuable lesson”? Never mind that Hudgens was an adult and a victim of privacy violation - the ‘scandal’ was painted as something for which she owed her fans an apology. Which leads us to:
2. These women do not ‘only have themselves to blame’
While depressing, it’s sadly unsurprising to see some people arguing that Lawrence et al brought this on themselves. Part of living in a rape culture is the ongoing expectation that women are responsible for protecting themselves from abuse, and that means avoiding behaviour which might be later ‘exploited’ by the people who are conveniently never held to account for their actions. But women are entitled to consensually engage in their sexuality any way they see fit. If that involves taking nude self portraits for the enjoyment of themselves or consciously selected others, that’s their prerogative.
Victims of crime do not have an obligation to accept dual responsibility for that crime. Women who take nude photographs of themselves are not committing a criminal act, and they shouldn’t ‘expect’ to become victims to one, as actress Mary E. Winstead pointed out on Twitter. 
Sending a photograph of your breasts to one person isn’t consenting to having the whole world see those breasts, just as consenting to sex with one person isn’t the same as giving permission for everyone else to fu*k you. Victim blaming isn’t okay, even if it does give you a private thrill to humiliate the female victims of sexual exploitation.
3. It doesn’t matter that ‘damn, she looks good and should own it!’
Stealing and sharing the private photographs of women doesn’t become less of a crime just because you approve them for fapping activity. I’m sure many of the women on this list are confident of their sexual attractiveness. It doesn’t mean they don’t value their privacy or shouldn’t expect to enjoy the same rights to it as everyone else. It also doesn’t mean they want strangers sweating over their images. That line of thinking comes from the same school which instructs women to either ignore of welcome sexual harassment when it’s seemingly ‘positive’ in its sentiments.
None of these women are likely to give a shit that you think their bodies are ‘tight, damn’. Despite what society reinforces to us about the public ownership of women’s bodies, we are not entitled to co-opt and objectify them just because we think we can defend it as a compliment.
I will not be seeking out these images out and I urge everyone else to avoid doing the same. I hope that all the women who have been victimised here are being appropriately supported by the authorities and their network of friends. And I hope sincerely that more people take a stand against this kind of behaviour.
Because this incident aside, it strikes me as deeply ironic that we will vehemently protest a free Facebook messenger app because we’re outraged at reports that it can access our phone’s numbers, and yet turn around and excuse the serving up of women’s bodies for our own pleasure. Our appreciation is no less disgusting just because it’s accompanied by the sound of one hand clapping.

Posted 14 hours ago
with 13,272 notes
Q You are cute and pretty :) (Anonymous)
A

I see no lie (ily!!!!)

Posted 15 hours ago
with 3 notes

code by urie